Skip to main content
PMs turning a teardown into a backlog

The discovery-to-backlog stack

Genspark teardowns the market, Whimsical maps the flow, Linear gets the epic. Not a meeting transcript and not v0 code.

Who owns what

  1. Genspark

    The teardown — competitors, capability matrix. Not wireframes and not tickets.

    Try Genspark (opens in a new tab)
  2. Whimsical

    The flow — journey, states, low-fi screens. Not the live web hunt.

    Try Whimsical (opens in a new tab)
  3. Linear

    The epic and child issues. Not the UX canvas.

    Try Linear (opens in a new tab)

How to use this stack

  1. Genspark runs the competitive teardown. Do not start in Linear.
  2. Whimsical gets the requirements as a journey and wireframes. Swap Whimsical for Miro if that is the canvas.
  3. Map agreed nodes into a Linear epic. One issue per slice.
  4. This is not meeting-to-backlog (Fireflies). This is not spec-to-prototype (v0).