Skip to main content

Recraft vs FLUX

A feature-by-feature comparison of Recraft and FLUX across 7 capability categories.

Try Recraft (opens in a new tab)
Try FLUX (opens in a new tab)

Modalities — Recraft Wins

Modalities: Recraft compared with FLUX
FeatureRecraftFLUX
Text Input
Yes. Text prompting is the primary interface.Yes, requires free plan. Text prompts drive FLUX text-to-image on the BFL API and open-weight inference.
Image Upload / Vision
Yes. Upload reference images for image-to-image and style matching.Yes, requires plus plan. FLUX.1 Kontext and Fill/Expand endpoints take images for editing. Hosted API is pay-as-you-go.
Image Generation
Yes. Core product. Raster output plus true vector/SVG.Yes, requires free plan. Core product: FLUX.1 [schnell]/[dev] locally, plus FLUX.2 Pro/Max/Flex/Klein via API.
Voice Mode
No. No voice interface.No. Not a conversational voice product. Docs mention synchronized audio on some FLUX 3 video paths; that is generated soundtrack, not a voice loop.
Video Understanding
No. Does not analyse existing video.No. FLUX 3 docs talk about generating video, not Q&A over uploaded video.
Video Generation
No. Not a video generation product.No. Not a video generation product.
File Upload (PDF, DOCX)
No. No document ingestion.No. Inputs are prompts and images, not PDF/DOCX.
Code Execution
No. Not a code tool.No. You run inference code; the model does not execute your Python.
Audio Input
No. No audio input.No. No audio-file input is documented for image endpoints.
Canvas / Artifact Editor
Yes. Infinite canvas for arranging and editing generations.Partial. Kontext/Fill/Expand are image editors via API, not a chat canvas.
Screen Sharing / Computer Use
No. No computer-use capability.No. No computer-use product.

Memory & Context — Tie

Memory & Context: Recraft compared with FLUX
FeatureRecraftFLUX
Persistent Memory
No. No cross-session memory of the user.No. Each generation is a job. No user memory layer.
Large Context Window
No. Not a language model, so this does not apply.No. Not an LLM context-window product.
Custom Instructions
No. No global instruction setting.No. No global instruction profile. Fine-tunes/LoRAs are weights, not a system prompt.
Conversation History
Partial. Generation history is kept per project, but there is no chat thread to resume.No. Dashboard jobs are not a chat history product.

Integrations — Tie

Integrations: Recraft compared with FLUX
FeatureRecraftFLUX
Web Search / Browsing
No. No browsing capability.No. Does not browse the live web.
Plugins / Extensions
No. No plugin marketplace.Partial. Community hosts FLUX on Replicate/Hugging Face. That is not a BFL plugin marketplace.
API Access
Yes. REST image generation API, billed by credits.Yes, requires plus plan. Official async API at api.bfl.ai (plus eu/us regional). Auth is an x-key. Pay-as-you-go, no seat fee.
Zapier Integration
Unknown. Not confirmed either way.Unknown. No first-party Zapier app was checked.
Custom GPTs / Bots
No. No agent or bot builder.No. No Custom GPT store. Fine-tunes are weights.
Real-time Collaboration
Unknown. Team plans exist; live multiplayer editing not confirmed.No. No multiplayer editor.
Live Social Data Integration
No. No live social firehose.
Live Citation Mapping
No. Not a cited-search product.

Developer — FLUX Wins

Developer: Recraft compared with FLUX
FeatureRecraftFLUX
Function Calling
No. No tool-calling interface.No. You POST a generation job and poll. No tool-calling chat.
Streaming Responses
No. Generations are returned complete, not streamed token by token.No. Async poll for the finished image, not token streaming.
Fine-Tuning
Partial. Custom styles can be trained from your own reference images. Not full model fine-tuning.Yes, requires plus plan. Open-weight [dev]/[klein] plus paid self-host licenses list fine-tuning and LoRA rights. API OpenAPI also lists fine-tune management.
Embeddings API
No. No embeddings endpoint.No. Not an embeddings API.
Structured Output (JSON)
No. Not a language model, so this does not apply.No. Output is an image (jpeg/png/webp), not JSON schema.
Reasoning / Thinking Mode
No. Not a reasoning model.No. Not an LLM reasoning mode.
Local Execution
Yes, requires free plan. Official GitHub inference repo runs open-weight FLUX.1 [schnell] and [dev] on your hardware.
Open Weights
Yes, requires free plan. FLUX.1 [schnell] is Apache-2.0; [dev] is a non-commercial license. Hosted Pro/Max stay closed.
Multi-Agent Orchestration
No. Not a multi-agent orchestrator.

Platforms — Tie

Platforms: Recraft compared with FLUX
FeatureRecraftFLUX
Web App
Yes. Browser-based; no install required.Yes, requires free plan. Docs point at a playground plus the dashboard at dashboard.bfl.ai.
iOS App
No. No native mobile app; the web app runs in a mobile browser.No. No official iOS app is documented.
Android App
No. No native mobile app; the web app runs in a mobile browser.No. No official Android app is documented.
Desktop App
No. Browser only.No. Self-host is your own stack, not a BFL desktop app.
Chrome Extension
No. No official browser extension.No. No official Chrome extension.

Privacy — FLUX Wins

Privacy: Recraft compared with FLUX
FeatureRecraftFLUX
GDPR Compliant
Unknown. Needs a read of the current policy before we assert this.Partial. api.eu.bfl.ai is documented as the EU/GDPR regional endpoint. That is data routing, not a published DPA we read here.
Opt Out of Data Training
Unknown. Needs a read of the current policy before we assert this.Unknown. Training use of API prompts was not checked on a privacy policy this round.
Enterprise Privacy Mode
Unknown. Not confirmed either way.Yes, requires enterprise plan. Pricing lists Enterprise self-host licensing plus custom volume/SLA. EU and US regional APIs exist.

Workspaces — Recraft Wins

Workspaces: Recraft compared with FLUX
FeatureRecraftFLUX
Projects / Folders
Yes. Generations are organised into projects on the canvas.No. No notebook/project product. Dashboard jobs only.