Skip to main content

Windsurf vs Kiro

A feature-by-feature comparison of Windsurf and Kiro across 7 capability categories.

Try Windsurf (opens in a new tab)
Try Kiro (opens in a new tab)

Modalities β€” Windsurf Wins

Modalities: Windsurf compared with Kiro
FeatureWindsurfKiro
Text Input
Yes. Chat and inline prompting throughout the editor.Yes, requires free plan. Prompts become specs (requirements, design, tasks) then implementation.
Image Upload / Vision
Yes. Paste screenshots and mockups into the chat as context.Partial. Homepage mentions multimodal inputs and Figma as context. A general image-upload vision API was not separately documented.
Image Generation
No. Does not generate still images.No. A coding agent, not an image model.
Voice Mode
No. No voice interface.No. No conversational voice loop is documented.
Video Understanding
No. Does not analyse existing video.No. Not a video-analysis product.
Video Generation
No. Not a video generation product.No. Not a video generation product.
File Upload (PDF, DOCX)
Yes. Reads files from the open workspace and accepts attachments.Yes, requires free plan. Works on local workspaces and, on the web, GitHub/GitLab repos in cloud sandboxes.
Code Execution
Yes. Cascade runs terminal commands and tests as part of an agentic loop.Yes, requires free plan. Agents implement, test, and can run headless in CI. Web sessions run in isolated sandboxes.
Audio Input
No. No audio input.No. No audio-file input is documented.
Canvas / Artifact Editor
Yes. The editor pane is the shared surface.Unknown. Overlapping columns disagreed (partial vs yes); left unverified rather than copying a no.
Screen Sharing / Computer Use
No. Operates on the codebase and terminal, not the screen.No. No computer-use desktop takeover is documented. Agents edit the workspace.

Memory & Context β€” Tie

Memory & Context: Windsurf compared with Kiro
FeatureWindsurfKiro
Persistent Memory
Yes. Memories persist project context across sessions.Yes, requires free plan. Steering files (.kiro/steering/, ~/.kiro/steering/, AGENTS.md) persist conventions across sessions and surfaces.
Large Context Window
Partial. Indexes the whole repository; the usable window depends on the selected model.Unknown. Uses multiple FMs via Bedrock/Auto. No token window is published on the pricing page.
Custom Instructions
Yes. Workspace rules files steer the assistant per project.Yes, requires free plan. Steering markdown (always / fileMatch / manual) plus AGENTS.md.
Conversation History
Yes. Cascade conversations are saved per workspace.Yes, requires free plan. IDE, CLI, web, and Crew keep sessions. Web sandboxes keep running after you close the laptop.

Integrations β€” Kiro Wins

Integrations: Windsurf compared with Kiro
FeatureWindsurfKiro
Web Search / Browsing
Yes. Can fetch documentation and web results as context.Unknown. MCP can pull tools; a first-party live-web search toggle was not confirmed.
Plugins / Extensions
Partial. MCP servers extend it, rather than a first-party plugin marketplace.Yes, requires free plan. MCP, Agent Client Protocol, Open VSX extensions, Skills.md, and 500+ CLI tools.
API Access
No. An IDE product, not an API.Partial. Headless CLI in CI/CD and ACP into other IDEs. That is not a public REST generate API.
Zapier Integration
Unknown. Not confirmed either way.Unknown. No first-party Zapier app was checked.
Custom GPTs / Bots
Partial. Workflows and rules rather than shareable custom agents.Yes, requires free plan. Custom agents plus steering; ACP into other tools. Kiro Crew is the open-source coordinator.
Real-time Collaboration
Unknown. Not confirmed either way.Partial. Team billing and shared steering. Live multiplayer cursors were not documented.
Live Social Data Integration
No. Not a live social-firehose product.
Live Citation Mapping
No. Not a cited-search product.

Developer β€” Tie

Developer: Windsurf compared with Kiro
FeatureWindsurfKiro
Function Calling
Yes. Tool calling drives the agentic editing loop.Yes, requires free plan. Agents take actions (implement, test, hooks, MCP tools), not chat-only replies.
Streaming Responses
Yes. Responses stream into the editor as they are produced.Unknown. Token streaming is not documented as an API contract.
Fine-Tuning
No. No custom model training.No. You pick models (Auto, Claude, GPT, open-weight). No custom-weight training product.
Embeddings API
No. No embeddings endpoint.No. Not an embeddings API.
Structured Output (JSON)
No. Not a language model, so this does not apply.Partial. Specs and property-based tests are structured artifacts. Not a JSON-schema chat API.
Reasoning / Thinking Mode
Yes. Available through the frontier models it can be pointed at.Unknown. Overlapping columns disagreed (yes vs partial); left unverified rather than copying a no.
Local Execution
Yes, requires free plan. IDE and Crew run on your machine; web sandboxes are cloud. Models are hosted.
Open Weights
Partial. You can select open-weight models (Qwen, DeepSeek, MiniMax, GLM). The Kiro product itself is not an open-weight release except Crew.
Multi-Agent Orchestration
Yes, requires free plan. Parallel agents implement tasks; hooks fire on IDE events; Crew coordinates tools.

Platforms β€” Kiro Wins

Platforms: Windsurf compared with Kiro
FeatureWindsurfKiro
Web App
No. Desktop editor only.Yes, requires plus plan. Kiro on the web (preview) is for paid Pro+ tiers; sandboxes keep running in the cloud.
iOS App
No. No native mobile app; the web app runs in a mobile browser.Yes, requires plus plan. Homepage: sign in on mobile with a paid account. Store listing OS split was not opened this round; Google/Apple both implied by β€œmobile app”.
Android App
No. No native mobile app; the web app runs in a mobile browser.Unknown. A mobile app is documented; Android vs iOS split was not confirmed on a store page.
Desktop App
Yes. A desktop IDE, forked from VS Code.Yes, requires free plan. Downloadable IDE for the OS; Open VSX + VS Code settings import.
Chrome Extension
No. No official browser extension.No. Not distributed as a Chrome extension.

Privacy β€” Windsurf Wins

Privacy: Windsurf compared with Kiro
FeatureWindsurfKiro
GDPR Compliant
Yes. Codeium publishes a DPA and serves EU customers.Unknown. Needs an AWS DPA read for Kiro specifically.
Opt Out of Data Training
Yes. Zero-data-retention mode is available; enterprise plans do not train on your code.Unknown. Enterprise privacy is advertised; a consumer training opt-out toggle was not checked.
Enterprise Privacy Mode
Yes, requires enterprise plan. Self-hosted and VPC deployment options for enterprise.Yes, requires enterprise plan. IAM, SSO, usage dashboards, IP indemnity, GovCloud, centralized billing.

Workspaces β€” Tie

Workspaces: Windsurf compared with Kiro
FeatureWindsurfKiro
Projects / Folders
Yes. Organised by workspace.Yes, requires free plan. Workspace .kiro/specs and steering; Crew is a persistent local workspace.